By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
HMOs bring infant formula one step closer to breast milk
1cb23f7bd5383342e5e053241b341a6720984b2fece6bec1dcafa1a6dde0b4a1
An illustrated explanation of Human Milk Oligosaccharides. - photo by Robert Lawrence
Five months ago, my wife and I brought our first child home from the hospital and began our crash course in parenthood together. At first, we fumbled through the routines of swaddling and diapering, which got easier with weeks of practice. Breast-feeding, on the other hand, did not. Gradually, we transitioned fully to feeding with formula.

Some version of this scenario is not unusual in the U.S., where the Center for Disease Control reports that 60 percent of 3-month-old infants are not breast-fed exclusively; by 6-months-old, this number rises to about 81 percent.

Feeding with an alternative to breast milk is also not anything new. There is evidence that, even as far back as 4,000 years before baby formula was created, our ancient human ancestors were turning to milk from various livestock to help sustain their infants. As far back as 38 years ago, I too was raised on mostly formula just like my child. But a lot has changed since then.

The most recent development in the quest to bridge the biochemical gap between breast milk and bottle-feeding is the addition of human milk oligosaccharides to infant formula. As a new dad and biochemist, seeing HMOs in infant formula for the first time this year intrigued me.

HMOs are the third most abundant class of biomolecules in breast milk behind lactose and lipids (fats). Like fiber, an HMO could be described as a complex carbohydrate. More specifically, it is a lactose-based short chain of sugar molecules.

Unlike lactose and other constituents of breast milk, HMOs are nondigestible and appear to have no metabolic purpose for the infant. Until recently, this has made their abundance in breast milk somewhat of a mystery.

As it turns out, however, HMOs are a source of nutrition, just not for the infant.

During the past decade or so, scientific research has pried open the Pandoras box of the human microbiome. Scientists have learned there are a lot of microbes living inside humans and our relationship with them appears to be far more symbiotic than we ever knew. This is especially important in the gastrointestinal system, where humans may have up to 1,000 different microbe species cohabitating with your gut.

But we arent born this way. The relatively sterile bellies of newborn babies are first populated with microbes acquired from mom via the messy process of child delivery, followed by breast-feeding, and eventually from fingers, toys, pacifiers and everything else that meets up with their mouths.

Among the first symbiotic colonizers of newborn bellies are various species from the bacterial genus Bifidobacterium. In this group, there are several species, and they are the most abundant microbes in both formula and breast-fed infants. Several other types of bacteria can be present in the infant gut as well, and the microbial demographics will vary from person to person, according to age and feeding mode.

We now understand that HMOs are a favorite snack for the Bifidobacterium and many of these other early colonizers that contribute to healthy digestive and immune systems.

In the same way that maintaining a healthy lawn precludes the growth of weeds, having a healthy amount of these benevolent microbes lining the intestines helps reduce the chances that more nefarious ones will be able to set up any gastrointestinal real estate. Because HMOs are a menu item for the good microbes but not the bad ones, HMOs are sometimes referred to as a prebiotic.

HMOs can also prevent infections from viruses (including norovirus and rotavirus) that often cause infants diarrhea or worse. They are able to neutralize these pathogens because they resemble the carbohydrate chains found on the surfaces of cells that viruses would otherwise latch onto before they infect.

As diverse as the microbes are that populate the infant gut, so too are the HMOs on which they feed. The number of different HMOs in human breast milk is estimated to be near 200, and their proportions vary from mother to mother and with stages of lactation.

For most women (but not all), the most abundant HMO in is called 2-FL (2'-fucosyllactose). This is the HMO that now appears for the first time in infant formula commonly available in the U.S.

While breast milk is clearly the best food for infants, it does make sense for formula manufacturers to adjust the composition when new ingredients, like HMOs, become available, explained Robert Ward, associate professor of nutrition, dietetics and food sciences at Utah State University.

But at 17 to 26 cents per liquid ounce, the new formula that includes the 2-FL HMO is among the most expensive on the supermarket shelf. Consumers evaluating this cost will want to evaluate if any of the benefits observed in breast milk can be replicated in formula supplemented with HMOs.

Some recent clinical studies are optimistic. Last year it was reported that infants fed with 2-FL-supplemented formula showed immune profiles that were more similar to breast-fed infants than infants fed with standard formula.

Another study last year also reported a similar effect on the gut microbe profiles when formula was supplemented with 2-FL and another HMO called LNnT (Lacto-N-neotetraose).

A study published this year also showed that supplementation with these two HMOs was associated with fewer reported incidences of respiratory infection and bronchitis.

These early studies were commissioned primarily by manufacturers of infant formula but, according to Ward, the studies are nevertheless useful.

Formula is the most highly regulated item in the food supply, and these studies are important to provide evidence for improving its composition," Ward said.

"These studies appear to have been well conducted. The clinical trials were registered, and they are published in very respectable peer-reviewed journals. I understand why some might be concerned that they were funded by industry sources, but I am not sure it would have been feasible to get research support from either the U.S. Department of Agriculture or National Institutes of Health.

It is likely parents will continue to see HMOs as an option in infant formula.

Although the dynamic complexity of a mothers breast milk will always be an asymptote that formula continues to approach yet cannot reach, any step that brings it closer to that goal is good news for the many parents, like me and my wife, who depend on formula to keep their infant healthy, happy, growing and beautiful.
Its toxic: New study says blue light from tech devices can speed up blindness
93cbd7a5475cccd1cee701424125d3abaa9b4beaa58d3663208f656cbbbd7661
A new study from the University of Toledo found that blue light from digital devices can transform molecules in your eyes retina into cell killers. - photo by Herb Scribner
It turns out checking Twitter or Facebook before bed is bad for your health.

A new study from the University of Toledo found that blue light from digital devices can transform molecules in your eyes retina into cell killers.

That process can lead to age-related macular degeneration, which is a leading cause of blindness in the United States, according to the researchs extract.

Blue light is a common issue for many modern Americans. Blue light is emitted from screens, most notably at night, causing sleep loss, eye strain and a number of other issues.

Dr. Ajith Karunarathne, assistant professor in the UT Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, said our constant exposure to blue light cant be blocked by the lens or cornea.

"It's no secret that blue light harms our vision by damaging the eye's retina. Our experiments explain how this happens, and we hope this leads to therapies that slow macular degeneration, such as a new kind of eye drop, he said.

Macular degeneration is an incurable eye disease that often affects those in their 50s or 60s. It occurs after the death of photoreceptor cells in the retina. Those cells need retinal to sense light and help signal the brain.

The research team found blue light exposure created poisonous chemical molecules that killed photoreceptor cells

"It's toxic. If you shine blue light on retinal, the retinal kills photoreceptor cells as the signaling molecule on the membrane dissolves," said Kasun Ratnayake, a Ph.D. student researcher working in Karunarathne's cellular photo chemistry group. "Photoreceptor cells do not regenerate in the eye. When they're dead, they're dead for good."

However, the researchers found a molecule called alpha-tocopherol, which comes from Vitamin E, can help prevent cell death, according to Futurism.

The researchers plan to review how light from TVs, cellphones and tablet screens affect the eyes as well.

"If you look at the amount of light coming out of your cellphone, it's not great but it seems tolerable," said Dr. John Payton, visiting assistant professor in the UT Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry. "Some cellphone companies are adding blue-light filters to the screens, and I think that is a good idea."

Indeed, Apple released a Night Shift mode two years ago to help quell blue lights strain on the eyes, according to The Verge. The screen will dim into a warmer, orange light that will cause less stress on the eyes.