By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
What's in a name? Why Mary is disappearing
4182852196

They’re the most familiar names at this time of year, but Mary and Joseph are disappearing from the cultural landscape as quickly as Santa’s sleigh at daybreak.

No matter that they preside over the world’s most famous family. No matter that, for most of the past century, they were as common as, well, inns. These days, in lists of the most popular baby names, Mary doesn’t even make the top 100. Joseph has fared marginally better; he’s in 53rd place on BabyCenter’s list of the most popular names of 2014. (Mary trudges in at 146, ignominiously sandwiched between Kinsley and Juliana.)

Philip Cohen, a University of Maryland sociologist, says no other name has so spectacularly fallen from grace as Mary has. It was the most popular girl's name for the first half of the 20th century, and going all the way back to 1800, according to Social Security and census records.

In fact, from 1900 to 1961, Mary was No. 1 every year, except for the six times she was bumped to second place by that upstart Linda.

Beginning in 1962, however, Mary began to decline in popularity and never made the top five again after 1968. Today, she’s eclipsed by a long list topped by Sophias, Emmas and Isabellas.

What happened?

The rise of celebrity culture

Patrice Fagnant-MacArthur, author of “The Catholic Book of Baby Names” and “Letters to Mary from a Young Mother,” suspects television has something to do with Mary’s decline. Although the first color TVs were sold in 1953, it was another 10 years before they began to be common in homes, kindling the rise of celebrity culture. “People started to see characters on TV whose names they really liked,” Fagnant-MacArthur said. “And also, part of it is the focus on uniqueness that we have today. People want their children to have names that are different from their peers.”

Cohen, whose book “The Family: Diversity, Inequality and Social Change” was published earlier this year, agrees that the declining popularity of naming girls Mary is not so much a statement on the secularization of American culture as one about the nation’s obsession with individuality. When Mary prevailed, “It was not an ideal to have an original or interesting or fashionable name. If you go back even farther, in some families, people would have two sons named John, in case one of them died. Individuality was not celebrated,” he said.

Moreover, it’s not a sign that an increasingly secular society is shunning religious names. The top boys’ names still include perennial favorites Jacob, Michael and Noah, and Cohen notes the recent phenomenon of “Nevaeh” – “heaven” spelled backward — which hit 25th in popularity in 2010.

“I don’t think it’s a rejection of biblical names, because Old and New Testament names like Daniel and Isaiah are very popular now. They are interesting and different, while feeling traditional,” said Janet Ozzard, executive editor of BabyCenter.com, which has been analyzing popular baby names for 17 years.

But there’s something about the disappearance of Mary, in particular, that no one can completely explain.

Can Mary make a comeback?

It’s possible that Mary, once considered too holy a name for common use, has simply become too common, or worse, too much the brunt of jokes. “When I was younger, people always sang ‘Mary had a little lamb’ or said ‘Mary, Mary, quite contrary’ to me,” said Mary McDonald, born in 1995 (when Jessica reigned). “And I get a few religious jokes here and there: Mother Mary, Virgin Mary, where’s Joseph?”

But McDonald, a Catholic and a sophomore at Notre Dame University, likes her name, saying it connects her to her family, and especially her grandmother. And, “it’s short and easy to remember, and outside of Notre Dame, it’s fairly unique.”

That, Cohen says, may be the key to why names prevail today. Looking at blogs where people discuss baby names, he finds a contradictory preference for names that are “kind of unique.” Given this, Mary might experience a resurrection of sorts, like Emma did. That name was popular late in the 17th century, hit bottom in the 1970s (dropping way below Mary — down to No. 450), and then rebounded to hit No. 1 again in 2008. It’s possible that Mary could rocket back to the top again some day, ironically propelled by her current unpopularity.

But that may take awhile, since Mary has not completely disappeared in America; she’s just going gray.

The website howmanyofme.com says that overall, it’s still the fifth most common female name in America. Despite the decline of new Marys during the past half-century, there are still more than 4 million Marys among us. They’re just not on baby-name lists, but in the Social Security line.

And Christians should take heart that names don’t necessarily speak to the popularity of the namesake. There are nearly 247 million Christians in the U.S., after all — and just 250,713 people named Jesus.

Jennifer Graham is an East Coast journalist and author. On Twitter, she's @grahamtoday.

Its toxic: New study says blue light from tech devices can speed up blindness
93cbd7a5475cccd1cee701424125d3abaa9b4beaa58d3663208f656cbbbd7661
A new study from the University of Toledo found that blue light from digital devices can transform molecules in your eyes retina into cell killers. - photo by Herb Scribner
It turns out checking Twitter or Facebook before bed is bad for your health.

A new study from the University of Toledo found that blue light from digital devices can transform molecules in your eyes retina into cell killers.

That process can lead to age-related macular degeneration, which is a leading cause of blindness in the United States, according to the researchs extract.

Blue light is a common issue for many modern Americans. Blue light is emitted from screens, most notably at night, causing sleep loss, eye strain and a number of other issues.

Dr. Ajith Karunarathne, assistant professor in the UT Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, said our constant exposure to blue light cant be blocked by the lens or cornea.

"It's no secret that blue light harms our vision by damaging the eye's retina. Our experiments explain how this happens, and we hope this leads to therapies that slow macular degeneration, such as a new kind of eye drop, he said.

Macular degeneration is an incurable eye disease that often affects those in their 50s or 60s. It occurs after the death of photoreceptor cells in the retina. Those cells need retinal to sense light and help signal the brain.

The research team found blue light exposure created poisonous chemical molecules that killed photoreceptor cells

"It's toxic. If you shine blue light on retinal, the retinal kills photoreceptor cells as the signaling molecule on the membrane dissolves," said Kasun Ratnayake, a Ph.D. student researcher working in Karunarathne's cellular photo chemistry group. "Photoreceptor cells do not regenerate in the eye. When they're dead, they're dead for good."

However, the researchers found a molecule called alpha-tocopherol, which comes from Vitamin E, can help prevent cell death, according to Futurism.

The researchers plan to review how light from TVs, cellphones and tablet screens affect the eyes as well.

"If you look at the amount of light coming out of your cellphone, it's not great but it seems tolerable," said Dr. John Payton, visiting assistant professor in the UT Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry. "Some cellphone companies are adding blue-light filters to the screens, and I think that is a good idea."

Indeed, Apple released a Night Shift mode two years ago to help quell blue lights strain on the eyes, according to The Verge. The screen will dim into a warmer, orange light that will cause less stress on the eyes.