By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Should this office still be elected?
crawford tom
Tom Crawford

Early in January, Richard Woods will be sworn in as the duly elected superintendent of state schools. He could very well be the last person ever elected to this statewide constitutional office.

There will be a serious push in the upcoming legislative session to put a constitutional amendment on the 2016 election ballot that would make this an appointed rather than an elected position. If that amendment were to pass, it would take effect after Woods serves his designated four-year term.

This is something that should have happened a long time ago, for several reasons.

Some of the former state school superintendents have been an embarrassment to the people who elected them. One of them went to prison for stealing federal education funds. Another one made Georgia a national laughingstock by trying to eliminate the theory of evolution from the science curriculum.

This is also an elected office that the state really doesn’t need anymore. Over the last 15 years, the powers of the state superintendent have been steadily whittled away through a series of bills passed by the General Assembly.

The state school superintendent is basically an administrator who is compelled to carry out the directives of the governor and the members of the state board of education (who are all appointed by the governor). Why go to the trouble and expense of electing someone who effectively is a department head controlled by the state’s chief executive?

State Rep. Mike Dudgeon (R-Johns Creek), a technology businessman with two electrical engineering degrees, is taking the lead on this issue. He pointed out that in 38 other states, the school superintendent is appointed by either the governor or a state board of education, and said it makes sense for Georgia to follow that example.

“This is not about who is or is not elected to the position tomorrow, but about good governance,” said Dudgeon, a member of the Forsyth County school board before being elected to the Legislature in 2010.

He noted that Georgia voters now elect four different entities or individuals that are all given the responsibility to determine how public education is handled: the local school board, the General Assembly, the governor, and the state school superintendent.

“There are already lots of elected people with a voice in education policy, so you really don’t have to elect everybody,” he said.
“It’s really about leadership alignment,” Dudgeon said. “With all those different elected people, it is a little bit difficult to get alignment in leadership.”

The alignment problem is illustrated by the ongoing discussion of the Common Core standards that underlie the state curriculum for K-12 public schools.

These standards were championed by former governor Sonny Perdue and were adopted by the state board of education in 2010. Gov. Nathan Deal has been generally supportive of the Common Core standards, and when Sen. William Ligon (R-Brunswick) tried to outlaw them in the last session, his legislative colleagues rejected his bill.

The governor, the state school board, and legislators are all on board with the Common Core standards. Woods, however, opposed Common Core in his campaign for school superintendent. How can you reconcile those conflicting points of view? You can’t — which is another strong argument for appointing rather than electing a superintendent.

One approach being considered is for legislators from each congressional district to elect a person from that district who would serve on the state board of education. The board would then appoint a state school superintendent. Lawmakers already use this model to pick members of the State Transportation Board, which in turn elects the DOT commissioner.

“The Legislature is setting ultimate state policy anyway, so the board they’re electing can implement the details of the policy they vote for,” Dudgeon contended.

There are many details to be worked out on this issue over the next couple of years and Georgia’s voters may decide they don’t want to give up this elective office, even though few people pay much attention to it.

Dudgeon does make a good case for streamlining the way Georgia develops and implements its education policy.

If local school boards, the governor and the General Assembly are the ones who make education policy, what’s the need to elect a state school superintendent as well?

Tom Crawford is editor of The Georgia Report, an Internet news service at gareport.com that reports on state government and politics. He can be reached at tcrawford@gareport.com.

In Effingham County, Progress Starts With a Plan
Guest Editorial by Susan Kraut, President/CEO of Effingham County Chamber of Commerce
Susan Kraut column
A sold-out crowd of more than 150 business and community leaders gathered at Effingham’s New Ebenezer Retreat Center Sept. 24 for the Chamber of Commerce’s annual State of the County Luncheon, hearing updates on economic growth, education, and infrastructure across Effingham County. (Submitted photo)

At last Wednesday’s sold-out State of the County luncheon, more than 150 business and community leaders heard a message that resonated throughout the program: We have a plan, and we’re sticking to it.

Effingham County City Manager Tim Callanan opened his remarks with that thought. It was simple, but powerful. In an era when news feeds churn with controversy and change, it served as a reminder that behind the scenes, steady planning is happening – and those plans are beginning to bear fruit.

Businesses and residents often express frustration about roads, zoning, parks, schools or economic development, feeling that growth is outpacing action. The truth, as Callanan underscored, is that many of those actions are already underway, rooted in master plans that cover everything from transportation and stormwater to parks, communications and public safety.

The challenge is that plans only matter if people know they exist. Too often, businesses and citizens forget these plans are in place, don’t know where to find them or don’t realize how to weigh in at the right moments. When that happens, the community loses the chance to shape its own future and to express the value of those plans – why they matter and why they’re worth supporting.

Planning delivers progress

Last week’s luncheon highlighted how “plans” translate into progress. Mayor Kevin Exley shared Rincon’s ranking as one of Georgia’s safest cities and the city’s launch of the Citizen Central app – a small but meaningful step toward accessible local government. Springfield’s new city manager, Lauren Eargle, outlined a capital improvement plan that includes sidewalks, drainage and playgrounds, along with the less glamorous but vital work of a $35 million wastewater plant upgrade. Guyton’s city manager, Bill Lindsey, discussed contracting with planning consultants, winning grants for sidewalks, and reinvesting in Bazemore Park and downtown revitalization. These aren’t random acts; they’re evidence of intentional planning.

The school district provided another example when Superintendent Yancy Ford noted that Effingham now serves nearly 14,500 students speaking 33 languages. That diversity is an asset – but it also requires careful, proactive investment to maintain the high standards families expect. His most powerful point concerned ESPLOST, the 1-cent Education Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax. Thanks to community support over the years, ESPLOST has built classrooms, purchased buses, enhanced safety measures, provided Chromebooks to all students, added security cameras and access-control systems, created inclusive playgrounds and athletic facilities open to the community, supported hands-on learning spaces like Honey Ridge, and established the College & Career Academy – a facility credited by Ford as helping lift the district’s graduation rate above 90% and expanding career pathways for a rapidly diversifying student body. And it has done so without incurring long-term debt.

Why ESPLOST matters

Among these examples of planning, none is clearer than ESPLOST — a long-term, voter-approved blueprint for funding education, renewed every five years to stay ahead of growth. The November ballot will again include the ESPLOST renewal, giving voters the opportunity to continue this proven approach to funding school facilities, technology, safety, transportation, inclusive playgrounds and community-accessible athletic fields. Renewing ESPLOST does not create a new tax; it simply extends the existing 1-cent sales tax, allowing residents, visitors and businesses to contribute to improvements that benefit every student. Without it, many of the projects parents and community members count on – such as new buses, safer schools, modern classrooms, career pathways and accessible playgrounds – would stall or require long-term debt.

Renewing ESPLOST is about more than bricks and mortar. It is not a reactionary measure but part of an intentional, ongoing plan to manage growth and maintain education – reinforcing the theme that plans become progress. As the district’s population becomes increasingly diverse and enrollment continues to rise, sustained ESPLOST funding is crucial to scaling programs, expanding facilities and maintaining the high graduation rates and opportunities that families expect. It is about protecting Effingham County’s tradition of educational excellence, maintaining property values and ensuring the workforce being prepared in our schools is ready to meet the needs of local employers. It is an investment in students, families and the future of our communities.

A call to the community

Effingham County is growing. Growth brings challenges, but it also brings opportunities. As the luncheon demonstrated, leaders at every level are working to guide that growth thoughtfully. The next step belongs to business owners, parents and neighbors – to lean in, stay informed and participate.

When hearing about a master plan, a referendum or a public meeting, don’t assume it is someone else’s job. Look up the plan, attend the forum, ask questions and cast a vote. That is how plans become progress – and how a yes vote on ESPLOST reaffirms and continues the community’s long-term plan for educational excellence, reinvesting in Effingham County’s future.