By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Springfield council debates raises for city employees
Placeholder Image

Members of the Springfield City Council discussed changing the way raises are given to city employees at a budget workshop Monday.

In previous years the council has voted to give a percentage raise to all city employees. The council discussed changing to merit-based raises.

Springfield City Manager Brett Bennett had suggested having a percentage pool where 3 percent would be a cost of living raise at the council’s discretion, and 4 percent of the pool would be for merit raises based on job performance evaluations.

Councilman Jeff Ambrose said he likes the idea of a merit pool. Councilman Dennis Webb said when he first joined the council he couldn’t understand why there was a flat percentage increase for all employees, and even after someone explained it he still didn’t like it.

“We had no system of evaluating,” Webb said.

Bennett told the council he could also have a pay study done to set up a pay scale for the positions in all the departments and have detailed job descriptions written.

Webb said evaluations would need to begin soon, and that would give Bennett an idea if there are adequate job descriptions for positions, and show if a study is needed.

Councilman Kenny Usher said he felt there should be a 4 percent pool for merit raises and no cost of living raises.

Webb asked how they could not do a cost of living raise. He said if the cap for merit was 4 percent and the cost of living went up 3 percent a person could only get a one percent raise no matter how well they perform their job.

“That’s pretty pitiful,” Webb said.

Usher said he sees “a pie that is going to be cut up.”

“Some folks based on their performance will get a larger slice,” he said.

Webb said it would not be much incentive for employees to exceed expectations if there is only a 4 percent pool.

Ambrose said everyone doing his or her job would have a 4 percent raise.

Webb said that would defeat the purpose of having a merit based raise system. He said if the cost of living raise is at the council discretion it should be given when the budget is made.

“I don’t know if you should sit until mid year to do a cost of living,” Webb said. “I don’t think that’s something council should hold over staff’s head.”

Bennett said he can see budgeting a cost of living raise to make sure the money will be available.

“I can see doing it at budget time,” he said. “It’s how you want to do it.”

Webb said it’s not really a raise it is cost of living, and the way this is set up someone could bring it before council, and the cost of living raise not pass.

Ambrose said giving a cost of living raise every year would inflate salaries of entry-level employees. He said if someone comes in at $25,000 a year and receives a cost of living raise every year after 20 years the city could have someone in an entry level position making $60,000 a year.

Webb said if that was what cost of living is that would be what everyone else would be making as well.

Mayor Barton Alderman said it would not only be the city increasing, it would be the national rate of living.

Ambrose said every time someone is given a cost of living raise that increase the entry pay for a new employee.

Alderman said if you hire someone now at $10 an hour in 20 years if they retire the employee would not be hired at $10 an hour because of the increase in cost of living.

Webb said that cost of living is not a raise, and when someone is given cost of living they are not receiving a raise.

Ambrose said in the business world, employees don’t get cost of living raises.

Bennett asked if the council was comfortable with merit, and not comfortable with cost of living. Usher said he didn’t think the council should give a cost of living raise; Ambrose agreed.

Webb said he would like to keep them separate.

“Let’s say that Brett and whoever does evaluations does an evaluation on an employee, and let’s say that employee is making $10 an hour,” Webb said. “The employee is doing everything in his job description, and not a dime more. What does he get? He’s entitled to cost of living. If you don’t, you’re putting him in the hole.”

Bennett said he would be comfortable with taking out cost of living as long as the merit pool is increased.

Effingham Library Board Votes to Leave Live Oak System
Effingham County Library Board
Effingham County Library board members (from left): Becky Long, Sherry Duff, Veronica Edenfield, April Nelson, Joanna Cartrette and Katie Fuller. (Paul Kasko / Effingham Herald)

SPRINGFIELD, Ga. — The Effingham County Library Board voted unanimously Wednesday to end its more than 80-year relationship with Live Oak Public Libraries and transition to the Statesboro Regional Public Libraries system. 

The transition must be completed by June 30, 2026.

What changes for patrons?

Library patrons should see no immediate changes to their services.

“Services will stay the same while we are working through the transition,” said Joanna Cartrette, library board vice chair.

Cartrette emphasized that the board has no issues with Live Oak staff and focused on the financial and operational aspects of the system before making its decision.

“There is no ill will toward LOPL or anyone who works in the current library system,” she said. “All of these are wonderful people. The last thing we want is any ill will.”

After the vote, Betsy McCullar, director of communications for Live Oak, said, “We are looking for an orderly and expedient transition.”

Why the board made the decision

The vote followed two weeks of due diligence after the Nov. 6 public hearing. Cartrette said board members reviewed financial data, compared budgets, and consulted with state and regional library officials.

Trustees focused on four priorities:

  • the county’s financial interests
  • patron services
  • governance
  • the future of library employees

Maintaining jobs for all current library staff was essential, Cartrette said. Employees will keep their positions and retain access to the Teachers Retirement System under the Statesboro system.

What options were considered

Board members evaluated three scenarios before voting: remain with Live Oak, join Statesboro, or create an independent county-run system. The board unanimously rejected the independent option.

“The independent option would have been more challenging and expensive,” Cartrette said.

Collection concerns: What Effingham keeps — and what it must replace

One of the biggest questions raised Wednesday involved what happens to Effingham’s library materials if the county leaves Live Oak.

Live Oak officials say roughly 90% of the county’s physical collection belongs to the regional system and would not remain in Effingham. Live Oak’s legal counsel, Wade Herring, confirmed during the Nov. 6 meeting that the county would retain about 10%.

Live Oak Operations Director Doug Bailey estimated the entire system’s physical materials were worth $1.09 million as of June 30, with Effingham’s share representing 9.48%. Replacing that portion could cost about $900,000, he said.

County officials dispute that estimate. County Manager Tim Callanan said the Live Oak agreement outlines a formal process for determining value, and the Board of Regents or the State Library can resolve disputes. Some audience members expressed concern that determining the collection’s value could result in a costly legal battle, but Cartrette said the valuation and acquisition “will not be a roadblock.”

Statewide resources — including PINES, Georgia’s lending network, and GALILEO, the virtual library system — will remain under the Statesboro system. However, additional databases purchased by Live Oak will not transfer, including Hoopla, a digital service offering movies, music, e-books, comics, and audiobooks.

Cartrette said the county has funds to rebuild the collection and could repurchase select materials from Live Oak. Board member April Nelson emphasized surveying patrons to determine which resources are most used. She noted that Hoopla costs about $50,000 annually and should be maintained only if usage supports the expense.

Financial impact

Callanan told the board the county would save about $338,000 per year — based on 2025 figures — by switching systems. Effingham currently pays about $1.03 million annually to remain in the Live Oak system.

Officials have cited Live Oak’s higher administrative costs as a strain on the county budget. The projected savings could be reinvested in library facilities, collections, and staffing.

Governance changes

Governance also played a key role in the decision. Effingham currently holds two seats on the Live Oak regional board, compared with eight from Chatham County and two from Liberty County — a structure some officials have criticized as imbalanced.

Joining the Statesboro system would give Effingham two representatives, matching other member counties — Bulloch, Bryan, Candler, Emanuel, and Evans — and creating what supporters say is more equitable representation.

Potential pushback

After the meeting, Ivy Gibbins and other supporters of Live Oak said they were researching a possible petition campaign to challenge the County Commissioners’ Oct. 7 resolution that recommended the library board end the Live Oak relationship.