By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Hill: A closer look at revenues
Placeholder Image

Last week this column took a look at Georgia’s revenue “portfolio” and reviewed updated 2007 information from 2007 U.S. Census information.

Georgia dropped in national ranking on expenditures and taxes apparently because of an increase in taxing and spending by local government according to an interpretation of that data.

This week examines Georgia’s state revenues more closely.

State revenues – A relative weakness in fees and federal contributions

On the revenue side, the state continues to rank near the low end of states on a per capita basis while local governments are in the middle or near the top of the rankings. One interesting aspect of Georgia’s revenue situation is that the state overall ranks relatively well in its core taxes, such as the income tax and sales tax.  

But, the state ranks last overall in its revenues per capita because the state continues to rank lower in terms of revenues brought in from the federal government and from revenues raised through various fees and charges including University System tuition and fees.

In 2007, the state retained its ranking of 43rd in the nation in tax burden per capita, bringing in around $1,923 per person while local governments in Georgia ranked 22nd bringing in $1,557 per person. Combined, this meant that Georgia ranks around 34th in the nation for both state and local tax burden per capita.  

Looking at the individual tax types combining state and local tax burdens, Georgia ranked 32nd in the nation in terms of property tax burden per capita, 25th for sales tax, 25th for individual income tax and 39th for corporate income taxes.  

State low, local governments high in sales taxes rankings

Property taxes are almost entirely local, while income taxes are almost entirely state.  However, sales taxes are collected by both the state and local governments and at the local level are used heavily for capital investment. Splitting up the share between state and local shows that the state raises around $799 per capita in sales tax, making it 42nd in the nation in terms of dependence on sales tax per capita, while local governments raised $492 per capita in sales tax, putting them fourth-highest in the nation compared to local governments in other states.

Low tuition affects low fee amount

Georgia ranked 42nd on current charges and miscellaneous general revenue bringing in $1,614 per capita. By far the largest amounts of charges for state and local governments come from charges from local hospital authorities and airport authorities, such as Grady Hospital in Atlanta and the Hartsfield-Jackson Airport.  

When we drop out these local revenues and look at state-only charges, the state ranks 49th in the country bringing in only $537 per capita.

Around half of these charges come from institutions of higher education, where the state ranks 46th in terms of revenues from higher education, at $200 per person.

Federal funds relatively low in Georgia

Finally, Georgia’s 2007 numbers for federal funds per capita are likely distorted by problems at the state Department of Transportation. In 2006, the state as a whole ranked 46th in the nation for per capita revenues from the federal government. In 2007, for no apparent reason, the state jumped to 31st in the nation. The per capita revenues went from $1,223 to $1,442.

Looking at federal funds alone as reported by the Census, the state has typically ranked in the bottom 10 states for receipt of federal funds. This is likely driven by a variety of factors, including Georgia being a donor state in transportation, receipt of fewer Medicaid dollars than other states, and Georgia’s younger population relative to other states.

Hopefully, a further examination of both fees and federal payments will disclose the reasons for these weaknesses.

I may be reached at
234 State Capitol, Atlanta, GA 30334
(404) 656-5038 (phone)
(404) 657-7094 (fax)
E-mail at Jack.Hill@senate.ga.gov
Or call toll-free at
1-800-367-3334 day or night
Reidsville office: (912) 557-3811

In Effingham County, Progress Starts With a Plan
Guest Editorial by Susan Kraut, President/CEO of Effingham County Chamber of Commerce
Susan Kraut column
A sold-out crowd of more than 150 business and community leaders gathered at Effingham’s New Ebenezer Retreat Center Sept. 24 for the Chamber of Commerce’s annual State of the County Luncheon, hearing updates on economic growth, education, and infrastructure across Effingham County. (Submitted photo)

At last Wednesday’s sold-out State of the County luncheon, more than 150 business and community leaders heard a message that resonated throughout the program: We have a plan, and we’re sticking to it.

Effingham County City Manager Tim Callanan opened his remarks with that thought. It was simple, but powerful. In an era when news feeds churn with controversy and change, it served as a reminder that behind the scenes, steady planning is happening – and those plans are beginning to bear fruit.

Businesses and residents often express frustration about roads, zoning, parks, schools or economic development, feeling that growth is outpacing action. The truth, as Callanan underscored, is that many of those actions are already underway, rooted in master plans that cover everything from transportation and stormwater to parks, communications and public safety.

The challenge is that plans only matter if people know they exist. Too often, businesses and citizens forget these plans are in place, don’t know where to find them or don’t realize how to weigh in at the right moments. When that happens, the community loses the chance to shape its own future and to express the value of those plans – why they matter and why they’re worth supporting.

Planning delivers progress

Last week’s luncheon highlighted how “plans” translate into progress. Mayor Kevin Exley shared Rincon’s ranking as one of Georgia’s safest cities and the city’s launch of the Citizen Central app – a small but meaningful step toward accessible local government. Springfield’s new city manager, Lauren Eargle, outlined a capital improvement plan that includes sidewalks, drainage and playgrounds, along with the less glamorous but vital work of a $35 million wastewater plant upgrade. Guyton’s city manager, Bill Lindsey, discussed contracting with planning consultants, winning grants for sidewalks, and reinvesting in Bazemore Park and downtown revitalization. These aren’t random acts; they’re evidence of intentional planning.

The school district provided another example when Superintendent Yancy Ford noted that Effingham now serves nearly 14,500 students speaking 33 languages. That diversity is an asset – but it also requires careful, proactive investment to maintain the high standards families expect. His most powerful point concerned ESPLOST, the 1-cent Education Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax. Thanks to community support over the years, ESPLOST has built classrooms, purchased buses, enhanced safety measures, provided Chromebooks to all students, added security cameras and access-control systems, created inclusive playgrounds and athletic facilities open to the community, supported hands-on learning spaces like Honey Ridge, and established the College & Career Academy – a facility credited by Ford as helping lift the district’s graduation rate above 90% and expanding career pathways for a rapidly diversifying student body. And it has done so without incurring long-term debt.

Why ESPLOST matters

Among these examples of planning, none is clearer than ESPLOST — a long-term, voter-approved blueprint for funding education, renewed every five years to stay ahead of growth. The November ballot will again include the ESPLOST renewal, giving voters the opportunity to continue this proven approach to funding school facilities, technology, safety, transportation, inclusive playgrounds and community-accessible athletic fields. Renewing ESPLOST does not create a new tax; it simply extends the existing 1-cent sales tax, allowing residents, visitors and businesses to contribute to improvements that benefit every student. Without it, many of the projects parents and community members count on – such as new buses, safer schools, modern classrooms, career pathways and accessible playgrounds – would stall or require long-term debt.

Renewing ESPLOST is about more than bricks and mortar. It is not a reactionary measure but part of an intentional, ongoing plan to manage growth and maintain education – reinforcing the theme that plans become progress. As the district’s population becomes increasingly diverse and enrollment continues to rise, sustained ESPLOST funding is crucial to scaling programs, expanding facilities and maintaining the high graduation rates and opportunities that families expect. It is about protecting Effingham County’s tradition of educational excellence, maintaining property values and ensuring the workforce being prepared in our schools is ready to meet the needs of local employers. It is an investment in students, families and the future of our communities.

A call to the community

Effingham County is growing. Growth brings challenges, but it also brings opportunities. As the luncheon demonstrated, leaders at every level are working to guide that growth thoughtfully. The next step belongs to business owners, parents and neighbors – to lean in, stay informed and participate.

When hearing about a master plan, a referendum or a public meeting, don’t assume it is someone else’s job. Look up the plan, attend the forum, ask questions and cast a vote. That is how plans become progress – and how a yes vote on ESPLOST reaffirms and continues the community’s long-term plan for educational excellence, reinvesting in Effingham County’s future.