By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Why small business joined the health care law suit
Placeholder Image

Just a few months ago, President Obama signed the health care bill into law, amidst much fanfare in Washington. But away from Pennsylvania Avenue, we’re hearing a different tune from small business owners. They’re asking: How much is this going to cost me, how can I opt out, isn’t there any way to stop this from taking effect?

What’s heartbreaking is that these are the very business owners who have been begging for real reforms — those that lower costs, give more choice and don’t burden them with more tax increases and regulations.

The feedback from small business owners was clear — they wanted the National Federation of Independent Business, the nation’s leading small business advocacy organization, to do something. That’s why we joined 20 states in the federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the recently passed health care law.

Plain and simply, the federal government has gone too far with this law, directly infringing on small business owners’ abilities to manage the day-to-day operations of running their businesses. The individual and employer mandates, combined with the onslaught of new taxes, paperwork requirements and new rules, will dramatically increase the cost of starting and running a small business. And while there are a few provisions that may benefit a limited number of small businesses, the overall effect of the law will do much more harm to small businesses than good.
What’s more, the law directly violates the Constitution. We don’t consider the Constitution an inconvenience. Expanding coverage by chipping away at the freedoms afforded to individuals and small business owners in the Constitution is unacceptable.

At the core of the lawsuit is the requirement that all individuals purchase qualified health care or face a fine. Forcing individuals to purchase something simply because they are alive is unprecedented, and we believe ultimately unconstitutional. The military’s draft is the only exception to this, and Congress’ authority to enact the draft is explicitly provided for in the Constitution, unlike this mandate.

What scares small businesses the most is the thought that if Congress can regulate this type of inactivity, then there are essentially no limits on what they can require individuals and businesses to do. If there are no limits, who’s to say Congress can’t pass a law forcing individuals to join a gym or face a fine? Aspiring for a healthier society is a worthy goal, but do we want the federal government mandating diets, exercise regimens, vitamins and supplement intake?

We want to make it very clear: NFIB has a long history of working on and supporting healthcare reform. We are not part of the “just say no’ crowd. Small businesses do need reforms that help to reduce costs and increase choices. We have encouraged reforms that cover pre-existing conditions, help to create effective and affordable national exchanges, provide the ability to buy across state lines, and include liability reform. But this new law resulted in more bad than good for our nation’s job creators. And this law is a bridge too far in terms of the future of our constitutional freedoms and liberties.

Small business owners across the nation deserved better, which is why NFIB is committed to doing everything in our power to protect the rights of small business owners by fighting to overturn this unconstitutional law.

Dan Danner is president and CEO of the National Federation of Independent Business in Washington, D.C.